|
|
|
BRIAN
O’HARA
President and CEO XL Insurance Limited
|
What competitive advantages does Bermuda
have over other jurisdictions? What makes it
the World's Risk Capital?
Today Bermuda is an important player in the
world's insurance and reinsurance markets. It's
an ideal headquarters for a global organisation
as it has a neutral position in the world; we
aren't really American, we aren't really UK
or Continental, but have a presence and operate
in all those places. I like to think of Bermuda
as a gateway to the rest of the world. Bermuda
treats capital more efficiently, providing large
amounts of risk capacity and getting the most
mileage out of the capital return which is essential
to this industry. When you add technical infrastructure
and a highly skilled workforce, it all comes
together as a natural centre for a large risk
business. The actual business that is done in
Bermuda is more wholesale; we are not close
to the retail customer and to do commercial
retail business you have to be present in those
territories. A lot of companies that are headquartered
here have operations all round the world. XL
has ninety offices in thirty countries. We have
capital in all of those places but it is backed
up by the mother-ship here in Bermuda. I never
look at Bermuda in terms of competition between
London and New York - we have 500 people in
London, 400 in NY, 200 in Connecticut and sizeable
operations in Zurich and Paris. And in Bermuda,
we have 350 people; it is not a brass plate,
which most people associate with an offshore
company in Bermuda.
There must be some challenges the Island
is facing in maintaining this leading position.
What would you say these challenges are?
The challenge is that it is a very finite physical
place and it will run out of room, which is
another reason why companies like ours have
expanded globally. We have to be more efficient
in what we have to do physically in Bermuda.
We try and encourage Bermudianization, in which
we make sure every job is first satisfied by
local capability. We also support developing
local talent by offering scholarships and funding
other educational programs.
Our readers are probably not fully aware
of the importance Bermuda has to the rest of
the world. Could you please explain what Bermuda
means to the world today and has meant for the
past 40 years?
Bermuda's impact on the insurance market has
been substantial, responding to a series of
major catastrophic events. For instance, the
Bermuda market responded to a severe shortage
of liability insurance in the United States
with the formation of ACE and XL. Hundreds of
companies went bankrupt and as a result, ACE
and XL were the solutions to the problem. In
1992, Hurricane Andrew collapsed the property
casualty market, sending dozens of companies
into liquidation and shattering reinsurance
results around the world. A wave of capital
companies came in to address that side of the
equation. Then there was September 11, which
cost the industry $40 billion, decimating capital
and the ability to respond to commercial insurance
needs. Bermuda responded with the formation
of a handful of companies who have become solid
players in the market. So there were three distinct
waves that really formed the foundation of what
Bermuda is about. I think if a fourth wave were
to occur, Bermuda would be the chief responder
and will weather it in very good shape.
How would you say that each of these waves
has learnt from each other?
We have learned more about assuming and managing
risk. For instance, there was a series of unprecedented
catastrophes, like we had in Florida last year,
which certainly impacted our earnings but not
our capital. Shareholders understand that we
take these risks which do affect earnings, but
not our capital that is in the investment equation.
We have all kinds of risk models, both internally
and externally, that we use to run scenarios
of 'what if'. What happened in Florida last
year was not in the models. Each time the industry
faces a new challenge, we try and recreate our
models to learn from them and prepare for events
that could occur similarly again.
XL's 2004 results were outstanding to say
the least, despite the many hurricane catastrophes
in Florida in 2004.
Even though we had $500 million dollars of
hurricane loss we still made over a billion
dollars. We have a good spread of business now
so a bad year in one segment does not affect
our business overall.
Success within the insurance and reinsurance
sector cannot be measured by looking at the
annual results. Difference can only be established
over a period of years. What would you say it
is that differentiates XL from other insurance
companies, what makes it a unique business partner?
There are two fundamental aspects to a large
commercial risk taker - first is capital. Companies
must have substantial capital and a high credit
rating to respond to major events. The other
aspect is intellectual capital. We put a lot
into developing our people - we have currently
three training programs running that continuously
upgrade the knowledge and skills sets of our
employees so they can better understand our
customer's needs. Respect, along with ethics,
excellence, teamwork and development, is among
our core values at XL. Customers will want to
do business with people they respect and who
have integrity. Given the nature of several
investigations currently going on in the insurance
industry, we feel confident in how we have been
conducting our affairs throughout. We think
in time that these attributes will be meaningful
to our customer's decision-making in who to
do business with. These fundamentals never go
out of style. There was a PWC survey conducted
with CEOs who said that reputation was of major
concern for them. As long as our core values
are in place, for the most part, reputuational
risk can be managed.
XL has an AA rating. How readers are keen
to understand the importance of these ratings
and the role the rating agencies play?
Ratings are critical. Companies conducting
multi billion dollar businesses want to make
sure that the company they are doing business
with will be there even in the most adverse
of circumstances. They are relying on us to
keep them in business when everything goes wrong,
so they are going to make a decision very often
based on a very strong credit rating. We feel
that AA- is the sweet spot in what we do - we
have an AA rating from Standard & Poor's
(S&P) and an A+ rating from A.M. Best. Our
financial guarantee business is rated AAA.
The rating agencies are the principal regulator
and therefore hyper critical to the larger commercial
insurance industry. You can satisfy a geographical
regulator much more easily than you can a S&P
or A.M. BEST ratings agencies to obtain a good
rating. Bermuda is much less vulnerable to insolvencies
than almost any other jurisdiction because property/casualty
companies require more capital and a high rating
to do their business. In other jurisdictions,
you can do business under the regulatory regime
with a BB or BBB rating. In the property/casualty
business, if you get below A, you are out of
business - no one will give you premium for
risk. The great majority of large companies
here are publicly held and have to satisfy the
Securities and Exchange Commission. We have
to file our 10Ks and 10Qs which details all
of our financial information. I think what we
are doing results in more efficiency.
XL is celebrating its 20th anniversary
and during especially the last ten years it
has grown into one of a handful of truly global
players. How are you marketing XL internationally?
What special attention is given to the European
market?
We have been doing business in Europe for some
time, going back to our Dublin office in 1990,
which was our only office outside of Bermuda
until the mid 90s. We made progress there but
we knew that to really have a presence in Europe,
we had to acquire a company with a substantial
European platform. We finally did by purchasing
Winterthur International - an international,
large commercial account property and casualty
insurance business - in July 2001.
In recent years, we conducted an active branding
and advertising campaign and held a global risk
conference called XL
Capital Congress in Montreux, Switzerland,
two years ago. That event centered on the theme
'Thought Leadership for a World at Risk' and
featured international speakers and panelists
who debated the major risk challenges of our
day, including social risk. We are going to
celebrate our 20th anniversary next year with
two XL Capital Congresses - one in Berlin in
May and one in Boston in October.
Having led XL to where it is today, what
still gives you satisfaction?
I hope that XL will live up to its potential
and the people who work at XL will live up to
their personal potential, doing the best job
we can for our customers. I believe that our
people can thrive and prosper at XL, which is
basically what it's about for me. It makes me
enjoy my work that much more.
The President invited you to the White House
after 9-11. What was your experience like?
It was riveting. I was among a group of CEOs
from the property/casualty business and it was
the morning after he had given an address to
the nation, rallying everyone together after
the September 11 attacks. He was in the same
mode that he was the night before. I will never
forget it. We were there to discuss the magnitude
of losses affecting the industry and how we
were going to respond. This was how TRIA (Terrorism
Risk Insurance Act) began and which is coming
up for expiration about this time. I believe,
especially in light of the July terror attacks
in London, that TRIA will be renewed. We do
need a backstop against future attacks, in particular
for Nuclear, Biological, Chemical losses, which
are uninsurable; we cannot cope with that type
of event. At a recent meeting of 35 (re)insurance
CEOs, I asked who thinks there will be another
major attack on the US in the next five years,
and almost everyone raised their hands. There
is no question that now is the time to address
this issue.